Developer-driven software distribution is a bad idea, which is why I dislike things like Flatpak.
Having distro maintainers involved in the process and installing your software from a free software distribution like Debian or FreeBSD is a much better distribution of power. The packages can be tuned to suit their environment without the developer having to repackage it for every distro, and the distro maintainers can keep out anti-features like telemetry and advertising.
The middleman may seem annoying to developers, but embrace the model and it'll work for you. Landing packages in your favorite distro isn't actually that hard, and the rest of the distros will follow. If you're an end-user who wants to see some software available for your distro, look into packaging and volunteer - it's easy.
This is also why I don't like developer-driven language-specific software repositories like PyPI and npm, Chrome and Firefox extensions, and so on, which unsurprisingly have constant problems with malware.
(I also dislike Flatpak for being a massive fucking bloat)
(and also because dbus)
(basically, fuck flatpak)
@sir Whats the issue with DBus?
@lanodan What can we do about libnotify then? Are there alternative specs which dont require Dbus?
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!